On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:08AM +0800, bigclouds wrote: > i find a bug fixed 1 year ago. > > type=VIRT_CONTROL msg=audit(1379813127.359:42015): user pid=1637 uid=0 > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > msg='virt=kvm op=start reason=booted vm="testname-1" > uuid=24f7e975-9aa5-4a14-b0f0-590add14c8b5 vm-pid=-1 exe="/usr/sbin/libvirtd" > hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed' > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835936 > > but in my case, i have 'setenforce 0',
If there's an SELinux-related regression, we should understand it, not hide it with `setenforce 0` ;-) Which is the version of your selinux-policy rpm? > i had not noticed both of you online on irc channel. how could you review my > code and talk about it. > thanks Sorry, we have plenty of holidays this time of year. You are most welcome to post the code on-list, or to vdsm's gerrit (if you would like to contribute it to vdsm_hooks). Dan _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
