On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:08AM +0800, bigclouds wrote:
> i find a bug fixed 1 year ago.
>  
> type=VIRT_CONTROL msg=audit(1379813127.359:42015): user pid=1637 uid=0 
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
> msg='virt=kvm op=start reason=booted vm="testname-1" 
> uuid=24f7e975-9aa5-4a14-b0f0-590add14c8b5 vm-pid=-1 exe="/usr/sbin/libvirtd" 
> hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed'
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835936
>  
> but in my case, i have 'setenforce 0',

If there's an SELinux-related regression, we should understand it, not
hide it with `setenforce 0` ;-)
Which is the version of your selinux-policy rpm?

> i had not noticed both of you online on irc channel. how could you review my 
> code and talk about it.
> thanks

Sorry, we have plenty of holidays this time of year.

You are most welcome to post the code on-list, or to vdsm's gerrit (if
you would like to contribute it to vdsm_hooks).

Dan
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to