On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:33:44PM +0000, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
> > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating
> > > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to
> > > broken vdsm rpms.
> I suspect you are not interested in "excuses" for each of the failures,
> let us look forwards. My conclusions are:
> - Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is
>   not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in effect, see
>   for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/20248/ and
>   http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19545
> - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec
>   requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days?

Is that based on repoclosure?

> - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we
>   should update
>   http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages
>   accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available.

I think it was done using pip directly. I'd prefer to have a repo
available for this on resources.ovirt.org through.

>   Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins
>   slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer
>   http://danken.fedorapeople.org again)

Again, I'd prefer resources.ovirt.org but anything easily installable
for the user is good.
vdsm-devel mailing list

Reply via email to