On 12.11.2013 15:33, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> I suspect you are not interested in "excuses" for each of the failures,
> let us look forwards. My conclusions are:
> - Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is
>   not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in effect, see
>   for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/20248/ and
>   http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19545
> 
> - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec
>   requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days?
> 
> - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we
>   should update
>   http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages
>   accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available.
> 
>   Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins
>   slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer
>   http://danken.fedorapeople.org again)

Yes, exactly. It wasn't my intention to blame anyone. I just wanted to
express how hard it can be to test and show up some points for future
work ;) I'm looking forward to the recent QA plans.

There has been an impressive overall improvement in the project over the
last year, but there is still room for improvement. Thanks all.

Patrick

-- 
Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg

HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to