Douglas Schilling Landgraf has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: vdsmd.init: verify if libvirt socket file exists
......................................................................


Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)

....................................................
File vdsm/vdsmd.init.in
Line 401:     # this workaround should be removed.
Line 402: 
Line 403:     for i in {1..50}
Line 404:     do
Line 405:         if [[ -S /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock ]] && [[ `pgrep 
libvirtd` ]]; then
> was this actually verified?
Yes.

Simple test, from bash (without need to reboot):
# cat test.sh 

if [[ -S /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock ]] && [[ `pgrep libvirtd` ]]; then
        echo "libvirt is running"
fi

# bash test.sh 

libvirt is running

# killall -9 libvirtd

# bash test.sh 

#

>  [[ -S /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock ]] && pgrep libvirtd > /dev/null 2>&1
> would have been syntactically better.

Well, you are the maintainer, you decide which style is better to maintain....

> p.s. you know how much I love short lines...

Indeed, what about add a git hook to fail git commit with patches > 80 chars?
Line 406:             return 0
Line 407:         fi
Line 408:         sleep 0.2
Line 409:     done


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8175
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0ada84192a639c7780c40d7df62e22e3c9fa9e16
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: vdsm
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsl...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsl...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Moti Asayag <masa...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ryan Harper <ry...@us.ibm.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yaniv Bronhaim <ybron...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
vdsm-patches mailing list
vdsm-patches@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-patches

Reply via email to