Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > on 10/3/2000 12:09 PM, "Tom Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about assuming someone will build Velocity templates using something > > like m4 or wml if they want macros? > > > > -Tom > > that totally defeats the purpose of simplicity for the designer. now you > want them to learn m4? give me a break. No. I would want them to use small, simple tools that can be combined in numerous ways to solve even more numerous, complex tasks; a la UNIX. Let me know when Velocity can send and receive e-mail. :) -Tom
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Jason van Zyl
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Fedor Karpelevitch
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Fedor Karpelevitch
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Functionalit... Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Function... Fedor Karpelevitch
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity Fun... Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Tom Vaughan
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Tom Vaughan
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Tom Vaughan
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Jon Stevens
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Justin Wells
- Re: Proposal for New Velocity... Jon Stevens
- RE: Proposal for New Velocity Functionality Geir Magnusson Jr.
