on 12/12/2000 1:36 PM, "Jose  Alberto Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Why? I see no need for the "(" be together with the directive name.
> I see no need for such rigid grammar, I do not see the current grammar to
> be ambiguous or anything else. Why does this smplify explaining the
> directives?
> 
> Jose Alberto

I agree.

#foo (
#foo     (
#foo(

should all work.

-jon

-- 
Honk if you love peace and quiet.


Reply via email to