Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 12/12/2000 1:36 PM, "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Why? I see no need for the "(" be together with the directive name.
> > I see no need for such rigid grammar, I do not see the current grammar to
> > be ambiguous or anything else. Why does this smplify explaining the
> > directives?
> >
> > Jose Alberto
>
> I agree.
>
> #foo (
> #foo (
> #foo(
>
> should all work.
The do all work. We are talking about documentation...
For the documentation, which was the original post of this thread, a
single consistant style might be nice and easier to read.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity : it's not just a good idea. It should be the law.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
