As I understand it, escaping the $ char is context sensitive. i.e. \$foo will render as $foo if $foo is defined but as \$foo if foo is undefined. To me this seems very unfortunate. Suppose I want to create a template fragment for use in many different templates which needs to render a literal $foo. This is impossible since I can never be sure whether or not foo will be defined and so I won't know whether to put \$foo or $foo in the fragment. Now this is not a huge problem, but it seems like an unnecessary one. Why were escapes designed to work this way?
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape jeff
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape Christoph Reck
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape jeff
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape jeff
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive esc... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive escape jeff
- Re: design rationale for context sensitive esc... Geir Magnusson Jr.
