"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
> >
> > "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why not placing user Exceptions and other "most used" classes directly on
> > > > org.apache.velocity?
> > >
> > > I thought about that at first, but figured it would help organize a
> > > bit. Not sure what the convention is around here. I just wanted to get
> > > them out of the bowels...
> >
> > IMHO, exceptions should be placed in the same package as classes that
> > use them the most. If no package looks to be a likely candidate, then
> > go with an exception package.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> I think these are exceptions for 'external use' - things that Vel will
> throw to applications using Velocity, rather than used internally. We
> have exceptions that we use internally, scattered about in the
> appropriate place.
In that case, it sounds like either org.apache.velocity.exception or
org.apache.velocity would be a good place.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
