"Patrick E. Whitesell" wrote:
>
> Hey fellas,
>
> I did some stuff to enchance the Context chaining. This is my first
> submission, so let me know if I'm way out of line...
>
> There are some ugly bits in here due to the fact that the innerContext
> is defined as a Context, not an AbstractContext. Does anyone object to
> making the innerContext an AbstractContext? If not, I can take the
> exceptions out of this code...
And yes, w/o thinking much about it, my first reaction is that we want
to keep it general as a Context, rather than the AbstractContext. This
should keep things more flexible for chaining arbitrary contexts. At
least that's the idea...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
