Fedor Karpelevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> what about smth like this (I may not be exact about the regexp syntax, but 
> you should get the idea:
> 
>       (#if\w*\(.+=.+\)\w*){([^}]*)}
> replace with:
>       $1$2#end
> 
> should work in most cases

That would work for a multi-line regex (i.e. ./../../s), but it would
also interfere with JavaScript.  I'm starting to get the feeling that
there's no smooth way to handle files which contain JavaScript short
of writing a full tokenizer.  :(
Thoughts?

Dan

Reply via email to