on 7/28/01 4:13 AM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> There has been a version of Velocity, src and jar, in whiteboard/geir
> for 2 weeks now that is an approach to providing the 'separate instance'
> functionality that people have been asking for.  There have been a few
> users that have tested it with positive feedback, and I think that there
> is no downside to this approach - it should be just as fast (or faster -
> I found a bug I fixed :) than the current post 1.1 codebase.
> 
> What this does is allow you to avoid the singleton model of Velocity,
> and create separate, independant new instances of Velocity :
> 
> VelocityEngine ve = new VelocityEngine();
> 
> I would like to check this in, as moving forward with anything else is
> somewhat painful for me as I must update both in my separate instance
> source tree, as well as my 'HEAD' source tree.
> 
> There are still three outstanding issues that I will take care of, 1 the
> bug reported by VM_INLINE_LOCAL bug reported by Dan, the implied init(),
> and what appears to be a logger issue, reported by Piero.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> geir

+1

-jon

Reply via email to