Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>
> Well, some of the things I do imply a modified version of Velocity that
> accepts a different type of iterator.
>
> I use read-only forward-only Resultsets and I do not load them into
> memory. I is possible to warp them in an "Iterator" but it is a solution
> with some inconvenients.
>
> Let me think if I write the thing before or after proposing plugable
> iterator types (I have a simple-to-implement idea for these).
Or just tell us - one of the really valuable things about Velocity is
that you can extend it as you wish for your own purposes, you don't have
to ask permission, and you don't have to contribute back the changes.
That is a very valuable statement in a use case, I think.
I mean, you would say that you had a unique problem, Velocity was 98% of
the solution, and you were able to simple extend the package for your
own purpose. That's a plus in favor of Velocity, if you ask me...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
Well done is better than well said - New England Proverb
