On 8/30/01 12:11 PM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/30/01 11:46 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/30/01 11:29 AM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I think jakarta-velocity-texen is cool. We can also consider if putting it >>> in Commons makes sense, just to give it more exposure. The reason I propose >>> this is it would might help ease any of the political concerns people would >>> have using Velocity, the evil JSP spoiler, whereas a Jakarta Commons text >>> processing tool is less frightening. >>> >>> <shrug> :) >> >> At first I would prefer to keep it in jakarta-velocity-texen if no one is >> averse. I would consider moving texen to the commons but not now. >> > > Why? > I don't see any benefit of moving it to the commons, I don't think there is necessarily any exposure or political benefits. Plus it's easier to move it to jakarta-velocity-texen than put it in the sandbox and go through the proposal process. Like I said I'm not averse to putting texen in the commons eventually, but I would like to work on it in jakarta-velocity-texen first. Who knows what it will become after it gets a serious cleanup. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
