Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > I just tried this, a fresh build and test, and it works fine. I wonder if > this is related to the "Singleton-challenged" nature of Ant 1.4? Sam, I > assume that you are using that for Gump testing? > > Can this be tried with Ant 1.3 to see if that is the case? If so, then the > solution might be to get Texen to use the separate runtime instance rather > than the singleton.... > > If not, then we emulate Sam's setup and debug... Jason fixed this problem this morning. I needed another entry in the classpath. Apparently the error message produced when this is not the case is called "NullPointerException". ;-) - Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Test Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
