Re: performance questions - faster Introspector

[Jon Stevens]

on 9/10/01 1:01 AM, "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> One other idea might be to not have static fields in the Introspector,
> but rather make them regular private class fields and then keep the
> logic simple since it would already be per classloader. But that would
> probably increase the overall memory usage of the cache since there
> could be duplicates of classes/methods in multiple instances of
> Introspector cache. I'm not really sure what I'm talking about here but
> what the heck...

+1

That sounds like the best and easiest solution to me.

-jon