on 2/22/02 5:56 PM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I looked at it again.  What are you talking about?  Jon didn't touch any
> braces...  He 'fixed'
> 
> if ( condition )
> 
> To be
> 
> if(condition)
> 
> Sorry. That's not an improvement.  There's no way you are going to convince
> me that cramming it all together is better...

Bzzzzzzzzzzttttt. Wrong. Go read the source.

:-)

It is:

    if (condition)

Which is perfectly acceptable and IMHO the most easy to read.

-jon


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to