On 7/8/02 5:23 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On 6/1/02 1:17 PM, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> What about JNI connectors to Velocity? >>> >> >> Isn't that the wrong way? Doesn't the C++ proggie need to start a JVM for >> the java code to run in? I am familiar with the other direction, Java code >> using JNI to run C stuff, but not the reverse... > > If running native code from inside a JVM using JNI, said native code > can call back to Java code (also using the JNI API). I've never tried > this without having the "starting point" be a JVM. > Jeeze, your mail queue is big... :) That's what I was getting at - you need to start with the JVM, afaik. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-203-247-1713 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
