Thanks. I like that implementation as well, though I think the implementation I proposed (see Bugzilla issue 20677) is cleaner; you configure and use it exactely like a 'normal' resource loader and you don't add resources directely to the loader (but to a repository that can have a variable implementation instead). The only thing that might be a concern is that the repository works with only one implementation. Maybe someone has a nice idea about solving this issue without making it more difficult to use.
I am not pushing to get my code included, but it would be great to have something like a scratch pad. I have no idea either though on how you (Nathan) could set that up without giving yourself a maintenance nightmare... Eelco > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Bubna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: woensdag 11 juni 2003 15:17 > To: Velocity Developers List > Subject: Re: velocity-tools goal/scope Was: Re: String resource loader > > > Eelco Hillenius said: > ... > > B.t.w. I could not find the contribution of 'Moshe' you Nathan Bubna > > mentioned. > > here's the thread that included it: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105296136800004&r=1&w=2 > > Nathan Bubna > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
