On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 02:34 PM, Daniel Rall wrote:


Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
Yes, you'd have to set the cache size to less than 1 to get the old greedy behavior. This is a feature, not a bug, as the old behavior retained memory based on the number of resources (templates, etc.) that were loaded and subsequently cached.

I documented that in the changes.xml file. Should we provide a more thorough example?
Well, we might want to doc, but the behavior seems to be benign.

To where should I add the additional documentation?

Thought about this. I threw the two params into the dev guide as I was in there for log4j update.


I also tweaked the name of the param to resource.manager.defaultcache.size to keep people from thinking it affected anything but the default cache. If you don't like, bellow :)

geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to