On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 02:34 PM, Daniel Rall wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Daniel L. Rall wrote:Yes, you'd have to set the cache size to less than 1 to get the old greedy behavior. This is a feature, not a bug, as the old behavior retained memory based on the number of resources (templates, etc.) that were loaded and subsequently cached.Well, we might want to doc, but the behavior seems to be benign.
I documented that in the changes.xml file. Should we provide a more thorough example?
To where should I add the additional documentation?
Thought about this. I threw the two params into the dev guide as I was in there for log4j update.
I also tweaked the name of the param to resource.manager.defaultcache.size to keep people from thinking it affected anything but the default cache. If you don't like, bellow :)
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]