LOL, the quick win would of course be better performance but the whole thing still has tie in with the legacy framework which only seems to support JSP's, and of course the old JSP files themselves. Still that shouldn't disourage me from trying to steer it towards Velocity I guess.
For the sake of completeness I'd like to share these figures with you which I've extracted from Rod Johnsons book "J2EE Design & Development"
The figures are based on the following and shown as hits per second running 100 concurrent clients continually requesting pages
hits per second 1. JSP using jstl = 54 2. Velocity 1.3 = 112 3. XMLC = 128 4. XSLT using Xalan = 7
Rod admits that these figures are only indicative but that the differences themselves are astounding!!! The latter ie 7 is what I'm experiencing now :-((
/c
Thx for listening
/c
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Colin Chalmers wrote:
Is anyone actually using DVSL for presentaion layer instead of say XSLT? Any performance issues to be concerned about?
We just implemented a solution based on XSLT and I have to say performace sucks!! Wasn't my choice of solution!
We use DVSL as part of Ant tasks to convert a bunch of XML reports from various tools into consistent HTML. I was very, very pleased with how much easier it was to transform XML than XHTML was, while using the same metaphor (?? approach, structure, mindset?) to document transformation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
