DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27741>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27741 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-20 13:36 ------- > This [the chained context implementation choice] could raise some BC problem, > since after the #foreach loop > the original context may be restored, but the application wants > to see the last value we had in the loop. very, very few BC problems : It's by far not worth the complexity introduced to keep BC for the 0.00001 % of the templates relaying on this behaviour. Plus, restraining the scope of the loop variable to the foreach block looks like quite natural. So IMO a simple chained context (solution b) is enough. Just a thought... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
