Hi guys, > ah, i see what you're saying. hmm. perhaps it would help to change > perspective. rather than see this as a true/false type evaluation, > see it as a render/no-render situation. then the template engine is > only responding to its own behavior rather than evaluating an external > condition. in other words, it says "i didn't render this, so i should > render this instead" (apologies for the anthropomorphizing).
I'm +1 for Nathan's suggestion. It's simple, easy-to-understand, and I don't see any backwards-compatibility issues on it (not that I saw any in the first place). So the conditions for the #else part to be rendered would be one of: - there were no elements to render - the introspector failed to get an iterator Am I getting this right? Best regards, -- Shinobu -- Shinobu "Kawai" Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
