On Sunday 23 January 2005 15:58, Shinobu Kawai Yoshida wrote:
> > I made a test for my problem and it works very well in java but not in
> > velocity. I can't even imagine how it could not work in velocity. I'll
> > check out the sources...
>
> You might want to file a new bugzilla issue while you're at it. ;)
I first want to make sure it's not supposed to have weird behavior (which
wouldn't be the first time.. *ahem*#set(...)*ahem*). Also, the jakarta
bugzilla isn't among the fiftyeleven ones I have an account on. ;-)
Anyway, it seems to make some weird assumptions about accessibility. Check
out this program and tell me if it's supposed to do this:
----8<------------------------------------------------------------------
import org.apache.velocity.util.introspection.*;
import java.lang.reflect.*;
public class Test1 {
public static void main( String[] args ) throws Exception {
Test2 t=new Test2();
Object[] objs={
t.pubStaticInner(),
t.pubInner(),
t.privStaticInner(),
t.privInner(),
t.anonymous(),
t.privInnerPrivMethod()
};
for (int i=0; i<objs.length; i++) {
Class c=objs[i].getClass();
ClassMap map=new ClassMap(c);
Method vm=map.findMethod("test", new Object[0]);
Method jm=findMethod(c);
System.out.println(c.getName()+":");
System.out.println("- velocity finds method: "+
(vm==null?"NO":"YES"));
System.out.println("- java finds mehod: "+
(jm==null?"NO":"YES"));
System.out.println("- java can execute method: "+
canExec(objs[i], jm) );
}
}
static Method findMethod(Class c) {
try {
return c.getMethod("test", new Class[0]);
}catch (Exception ex) {
return null;
}
}
static String canExec(Object o, Method m) {
if (m==null) return "n/a";
try {
m.invoke(o, new Object[0]);
return "YES";
}catch (Exception ex) {
return "NO";
}
}
}
---->8------------------------------------------------------------------
and the helper-class:
----8<------------------------------------------------------------------
public class Test2 {
public Object pubStaticInner() {
return new PubStaticInner();
}
public Object pubInner() {
return new PubInner();
}
public Object privStaticInner() {
return new PrivStaticInner();
}
public Object privInner() {
return new PrivInner();
}
public Object anonymous() {
return new Object() {
public String test() {
return "anonymous";
}
};
}
public Object privInnerPrivMethod() {
return new PrivInnerPrivMethod();
}
public static class PubStaticInner {
public String test() {
return "pub-static-inner";
}
}
public class PubInner {
public String test() {
return "pub-inner";
}
}
private static class PrivStaticInner {
public String test() {
return "priv-static-inner";
}
}
private class PrivInner {
public String test() {
return "priv-inner";
}
}
private class PrivInnerPrivMethod {
private String test() {
return "priv-inner-priv-method";
}
}
}
---->8------------------------------------------------------------------
I get the following output:
----8<------------------------------------------------------------------
Test2$PubStaticInner:
- velocity finds method: YES
- java finds mehod: YES
- java can execute method: YES
Test2$PubInner:
- velocity finds method: YES
- java finds mehod: YES
- java can execute method: YES
Test2$PrivStaticInner:
- velocity finds method: NO
- java finds mehod: YES
- java can execute method: YES
Test2$PrivInner:
- velocity finds method: NO
- java finds mehod: YES
- java can execute method: YES
Test2$1:
- velocity finds method: NO
- java finds mehod: YES
- java can execute method: YES
Test2$PrivInnerPrivMethod:
- velocity finds method: NO
- java finds mehod: NO
- java can execute method: n/a
---->8------------------------------------------------------------------
It's those cases where java can execute a method but velocity can't see it
that I'm worried about. Apparently velocity ignores all methods in a
private classes, even if the methods themselves are public.
- Marcus Sundman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
