DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25874>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25874 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-24 08:34 ------- Re: performance testing I wrote a simple integer-math heavy template, and merged it 1000 times. I did this three times and averaged the time. The results were interesting. Velocity 1.4: with caching: 488 ms no caching: 23944 ms SVN head (as of 1-23-2004) + number patch: with caching: 604ms no caching: 24198 The results were also the same for Velocity 1.4 and SVN head (without the number patch). Interestingly, I also did this with an empty template. The results were almost the same in each case. Conclusion - without caching there is little difference. With caching, there is a slowdown for parsing templates. The content of the template doesn't seem to matter. Let's discuss on the dev list. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
