> Developers should have a great deal more flexibility than [end user] demployments. +1
Jakarta projects can be a bit schizophrenic... AFAIK, the idea of GUMP is to always use the "latest" as this is assumed to be the most stable/bug-fixed. But then here we are deciding if it's okay to require an Ant version that's ancient. ;-) Personally I'd move to 1.6.2 -- to get all the latest bug fixes/new features -- from July 2004...already 8 months old. I think that would actually make things easier on developers... I know I've been at 1.6.x for years now, and it's a pain when I do something and find that "oops, this old version of Ant doesn't support that option" and then I have to workaround. Timo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
