On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:11:10 -0800, Shinobu Kawai
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
> 
> > ArrayTool:
> > this can be very useful and doesn't add any dependencies.  however,
> > its functionality is stuff on my wishlist for the core.  and deep
> > down, i fear that adding it to Tools will lower the likelihood someone
> > will get enough of an "itch" to patch the core.  (and by all that, i
> > mean making arrays and Lists indistinguishable to a template author).
> > hmm.  i wonder if that means we should make the ArrayTool
> > transparently handle Lists and arrays the same, as a kind of
> > demonstration for what the core should do (albeit with different
> > syntax).  anyway, i've pretty much decided i would add this tool, i
> > just haven't gotten around to it.  :)
> 
> Actually, ArrayTool originally treated arrays and Lists the same, but
> I removed the List part because I thought it should focus on arrays.
> And you can handle Lists quite well from the template already.

focus is fine, but i think it better to free developers and template
authors from bothering over whether a reference is a list or an array.
 IMHO, that shouldn't be a concern in a template, and the core should
handle both the same transparently.  of course, it doesn't at present,
but that's all the more reason to make the tool do it.

> ## But I don't mind putting it back.  ;)

that'd be great!  and when you do, it should probably be called
ListTool, because "list" is more commonly understood and more generic
(at least i think so).

> Best regards,
> -- Shinobu
> 
> --
> Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to