Henning had suggested "engine" rather than "core". Is there any preference between the two, or for an entirely different name?
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 07:02 -0700, Will Glass-Husain wrote: > I'm a +1 on this. Not a big deal, but makes sense. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel L. Rall" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:53 PM > Subject: Re: Subversion strategy > > > > On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 09:13 +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> "Daniel L. Rall" <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> >As suggested by Henning, this is what I originally imagined: > >> > >> >jakarta/ > >> > velocity/ > >> > dvsl/ > >> > tools/ > >> > core/ > >> > >> >If no one has a problem with that structure, I'll make the changes. > >> > >> +1 (obviously) :-) > > > > I will be pursuing this Real Soon Now (tm) unless I hear an objection. > > Afterwards, developers will need to 'svn switch' your working copies to > > avoid having every file in them disappear out from under you. > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
