[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-407?page=all ]

Daniel Rall updated VELOCITY-407:
---------------------------------

        Summary: Templates vs. static content should be resolvable via file 
naming pattern  (was: Templates should follow the double extension naming 
convention)
    Description: 
The VelocityViewServlet.getTemplate() method should append ".vtl"
to the URI by default (and only handle .vtl files in its servlet-mapping
clause).

So, a request http://www.foo.com/bar.html would map :
1. to a template bar.html.vtl if found
2. to a regular html file bar.html otherwise

Beyond the first basic samples, any webapp will need such a behaviour.
So all application designers will have to subclass VelocityViewServlet to do it.

Why not then incorporate it by default ? It looks rather important to me. Having
to subclass the VelocityViewServlet for each and every project is really silly.

Since there is a backward compatibility issue, one could trigger the behaviour 
with
a configuration flag and wait for the tools 2.0 to have the default changed.

  was:
The VelocityViewServlet.getTemplate() method should postpone ".vtl"
to the URI by default (and only handle .vtl files in its servlet-mapping
clause).

So, a request http://www.foo.com/bar.html would map :
1. to a template bar.html.vtl if found
2. to a regular html file bar.html otherwise

Beyond the first basic samples, any webapp will need such a behaviour.
So all application designers will have to subclass VelocityViewServlet to do it.

Why not then incorporate it by default ? It looks rather important to me. Having
to subclass the VelocityViewServlet for each and every project is really silly.

Since there is a backward compatibility issue, one could trigger the behaviour 
with
a configuration flag and wait for the tools 2.0 to have the default changed.

--
Claude


       Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

This is extremely specific to a single use case.  It sounds like it might be 
reasonable as a supporting tool, but has no place as the default behavior, nor 
really even as a configuration option.  Please re-word the request, or close as 
WONTFIX.

> Templates vs. static content should be resolvable via file naming pattern
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: VELOCITY-407
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-407
>      Project: Velocity
>         Type: Wish
>   Components: Tools
>     Versions: Tools-1.2
>  Environment: all
>     Reporter: Claude Brisson
>     Priority: Minor

>
> The VelocityViewServlet.getTemplate() method should append ".vtl"
> to the URI by default (and only handle .vtl files in its servlet-mapping
> clause).
> So, a request http://www.foo.com/bar.html would map :
> 1. to a template bar.html.vtl if found
> 2. to a regular html file bar.html otherwise
> Beyond the first basic samples, any webapp will need such a behaviour.
> So all application designers will have to subclass VelocityViewServlet to do 
> it.
> Why not then incorporate it by default ? It looks rather important to me. 
> Having
> to subclass the VelocityViewServlet for each and every project is really 
> silly.
> Since there is a backward compatibility issue, one could trigger the 
> behaviour with
> a configuration flag and wait for the tools 2.0 to have the default changed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to