Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >hey folks,
>it's been a long time since VelocityTools 1.1 final was released. in >the meantime, we've made many improvements and fixes, and so has the >Struts project. since both Struts and Velocity are gearing up for big >evolutionary releases (Struts 1.3 and Velocity 1.5) with growing >rumors of revolution (Struts Ti? Clarity? Velocity 2?) on the horizon, Struts Ti? Never heard that. I only know "Sirens (of) Ti" (http://www.treasureisland.com/pages/ent_sirens.asp) ;-) >i think it is high time we got VelocityTools 1.2 out the door. The >bug list is clear, and i'm eager to get this released. [...] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Vote: VelocityTools 1.2 release plan >[X] +1 I fully support this plan. >[ ] +0 I like it, but... >[ ] -0 I'm not sure this is a good idea because... >[ ] -1 I am against this because... >-------------------------------------------------------------------- (Actually it is more of +0.99: Will VelTools 1.2 require Velocity 1.5 or will it work with Velocity 1.4, too? Best regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development 4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
