> > Then the core can stay clean and simple, but is extensible. Think there
> > really should be an #output("on/off") directive? Fine, write it
> into your
> > preprocessor.
>
> They are actually separate ideas. The #output() is a directive, so it
> wouldn't be affected by the preprocessor unless you are doing something
> *really* weird.
I was vizualizing that velocity would locate the Template resource, and pass
it to the preprocessor which would return a (supposedly) valid VM template
as a stream for consumption.
Any type of transformation of the stream is possible isn't it? Do I have the
wrong idea?
-------------------------------
Kevin Baynes
Software Engineer
SEAGULL Software
kbaynes at seagullsw dot com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
