Good question! (which of course means I don't have the answer) Anybody know?
Anna Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the actual size of the vein without tourniquet?
--- DS BROADHURST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> At the AVA conference in Savannah, one of the
> presenters (Tim Lacey?) stated that he measured the
> size of the vein (which you can do with the ILook)
> to determine whether the vein was large enough. I
> believe he said that the vein should be 3 times
> larger than the catheter size (4 Fr=~1.3mm & 5 Fr
> =1.6 mm)- someone please correct me if I'm mistaken.
>
> Daphne Broadhurst
> Ottawa, ON
>
> "Bell, Roberta M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> You would have to clarify, which ulstrasound
> device you are referencing I think.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Erickson, Wendy
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Vessel size on ultrasound
>
>
> We've lost our Ilook ultrasound manual. Does
> anyone know if the size of the vessel we see on the
> screen is the actual size of the vessel? Thanks in
> advance!
> Wendy Erickson
> ********************Confidentiality
> Notice********************
>
>
>
> This message is intended for the sole use of the
> individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and
> may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this email message,
> including any attachment, is prohibited. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please advise the sender
> by reply email and destroy all copies of the
> original message. Thank you.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
