There have been some studies to document the fact that markers of inflammation are not caused by the catheter material, both polyurethane and silicone. So I would not think that the catheter material is the problem. However, there could be stimulation of mast cells by the physical presence of the catheter, both materials. When mast cells degranulate, they release histamine and heparin plus other factors are metabolized on the mast cell wall through lipid synthesis. These factors are responsible for extending the signs and symptoms. I have seen the problem of site redness in a circular pattern around the puncture site; it never improves or gets worse. The difference between what I am describing and the original question is that there has never been any drainage from what I have seen. In the original question, there was drainage that apparently responded to a Biopatch. So I would think this to be an infectious process, and not a simple immune respond to the presence of the catheter. Lynn

At 2:30 PM -0700 5/15/06, Dianne Sim wrote:
From: Dianne Sim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:25 PM
To: 'Anna Liang'
Subject: RE: picc site redness

Just as some folks develop keloid tissue more than others, I think that some
patient's insertion sites respond to the mechanical irritation of the
catheter in situ and/or the catheter composition, in varying degrees. The
trick is to know what is considered normal and what is not. In the
institutions I had worked at, "normal" errythema was thought to be anything
smaller than 1cm diameter across the site. Of course, if you pick up any
other signs or symptoms in your assessment, such as swelling, induration,
exudate, pain, palpable cord it could change your diagnosis. In this case, I
would probably have the staff continue observation of the site qShift and
only respond if the errythema increases past 1cm or has other S&S.
Regards

Dianne Sim RN
CEO & President

IV Assist, Inc.,
2675 Appian Way
Pinole, CA  94564
Phone: (510) 222-8403
Fax: (510) 222-8277
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail and any attachments are intended only
for the use of those to whom it is addressed and may contain information
that is confidential and prohibited from further disclosure under law. If
you have received this e-mail in error, its review, use, retention and/or
distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message and any attachments.[v1.0]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anna Liang
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: picc site redness

would like to know your practice regarding dealing
with site redness.

one kid has a picc, last week there was some drainage
on the site, and the site is red -- the biopatch was a
bit swelled up. in order to assess the site, the
dressing was changed every 2-3 days with biopatch.
there is no more drainage. but the site is still red
(0.5cm X 0.5cm).

should I consider pulling the picc if the redness does
not improve?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Lynn Hadaway, M.Ed., RNC, CRNI
Lynn Hadaway Associates, Inc.
126 Main Street, PO Box 10
Milner, GA 30257
http://www.hadawayassociates.com
office 770-358-7861

Reply via email to