And could personal issues with each other please be dealt with
PERSONALLY rather than on the list serve to see??!!   Wendy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:52 PM
To: Heather Nichols; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Midline guidelines from AVA roundtable

Dear Heather
    Please have a more forgiving heart for nurses who are less educated
than yourself.  A person can only do their best, based on the knowledge
they have at any given moment.  I used to get very aggravated by such
nurses, but let's face it...not all nurses get the same education. I
have heard others speak on this listserve of MD who need IV education as
well.  Yet those same persons do not disrespect MD.  Let us SUPPORT and
EDUCATE our young/old/less knowledgable nurses....not eat them for
breakfast!  Too many times in my career I have seen nurses get blamed
and disciplined for not knowing something they should have.  Why is it
nurses can be our own worst enemy??? 
    Until we can get nursing programs to require Infusion therapy as a
SEPARATE course aand not integrated into other things like pharmacy, ICU
and Medsurg classes...we will continue to see nurses who have little
knowledge in the Infusion therapy area.  Also facilities think any nurse
can insert an IV.  There are many MD offices that have the med techs
start the IV when they draw blood and then expect the nurses to give
vesicant chemotherapy thru these lines. They see starting IVs as a
skill....a skill can be learned by most any professional willing to
learn.
          We need the rest of the world (outside IV teams and IV nurses)
to realize is that infusion theapy is an ART, not everyone is good at
it.  Nor should they be expected to perform a skill they are not
comfortable or competent to perform.
 
end of soapbox, thank you for reading my rant!
--
Susan Schuetrumpf, CRNI
VASPRO
Atlanta, GA
cell-404-606-1194
 

        -------------- Original message -------------- 
        From: "Heather Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        
        Victoria,
           I feel you do them a favor by calling them "professionals" if
they do not realize this on their own.
         
         
        Heather Nichols RN BSN CRNI 
        Infusion Services
        University of Louisville Trauma Institute
        530 S. Jackson St.
        Lou. Ky. 40202
        (502)562-3530
        
        >>> "VICTORIA SALLESE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/17/2006 9:19 AM
>>>
        
        Correct, Vanco is not appropriate for a midline. End of
discussion. If only we could get professionals to realize this.
        
        Victoria Sallese 
        VAT 
        Johns Hopkins Hospital 
        
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: "Kokotis, Kathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        Date: Saturday, October 14, 2006 10:14 pm 
        Subject: RE: Midline guidelines from AVA roundtable 
        To: Bev and Tim Royer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kelly Murphy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        
        > I will discourage anyone from running Vancomycin thru a
midline period 
        > It is a vesicant 
        > My mother thrombosed in seven days of Vanco via a midline
placed 
        > in a 
        > physician infusion office 
        > The nurse's answer was to give the vanco every other day to
rest the 
        > arm.  I stopped that as soon as I got home four days later 
        > I ran into a major University Hospital go ing u n-named this
week that 
        > does vanco via midlines for two weeks of therapy 
        > 
        > Tom Lawson who did a wonderful paper back in the old days on
infusates 
        > via midlines (mid 90's) indicated that the complication rate
with 
        > Vancowas over 30%.  That is way higher than the complication
rate 
        > of PICC 
        > lines with vanco.  I need to pull out that old paper done on
landmark. 
        > It was a great paper on all drugs given via midlines and their

        > complication rates 
        > 
        > Kathy 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail and any attachments are 
        > intended only for the use of those to whom it is addressed and
may 
        > contain information that is confidential and prohibited from 
        > further disclosure under law. If you have received this e-mail
in 
        > error, its review, use, retention and/or distribution is
strictly 
        > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact 
        > the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original 
        > message and any attachments.[v1.0] 
        > ________________________________ 
        > 
        > 
        > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bev and
Tim Royer 
        > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 9:52 AM 
        > To: 'Kelly Murphy'; 'Chris Cavanaugh'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        > Subject: RE: Midline guidelines from AVA roundtable 
        > 
        > 
        > Kelly, 
        > 
        > Our experience has been the same.  Have had some minimal
success with 
        > midlines in those patients in our long term facilities that
needed 
        > access for every other day hydration and slow rates (these
sometimes 
        > last up to 3 weeks).  Everything else usually starts leaking
at 
        > the site 
        > in a week or under, which could mean the vein thrombosed off
above the 
        > tip.  Also, they stop aspirating after 4-5 days. 
        > 
        > Chris brings up an interesting point though - catheter size.
For 
        > midlines we are using 4fr silicone catheters with the tip
terminating 
        > just before the axillary vein. 
        > 
        > Chris, 
        > 
        > What size midline catheter are you using? 
        > 
        > Looks like a great subject for research - Midline catheter
size and/or 
        > material. 
        > 
        > Timothy Royer, RN, BSN, CRNI 
        > 
        > ________________________________ 
        > 
        > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly
Murphy 
        > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 7:29 AM 
        > To: Chris Cavanaugh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        > Subject: Re: Midline guidelines from AVA roundtable 
        > 
        > 
        > This is a little off the original subject, but I have not seen
a 
        > midlinethat has lasted t he length of treatment ye t.  Just 
        > yesterday, a patient 
        > came to the ED with a midline that was placed 2 weeks ago.  It
was 
        > leaking at the insertion site.  I spoke with ID and they said
he 
        > needed10 more days of IV antibiotics and no, we couldn't
change 
        > him to PO. 
        > Originally, I was talked into the midline because they weren't

        > sure if 
        > he needed 2-3 days or 2-3 weeks, with the promise from both
the MD and 
        > the PA that if the treatment lasted 2 weeks, the patient would
be 
        > readmitted.  Being the patient advocate I am, I opted for a
midline. 
        > Long story short, I ended up putting a PICC in him yesterday
in 
        > the ED. 
        > This just reconfirms my belief that midlines are relatively
useless 
        > except maybe in CMO cases.  Almost every midline I've inserted
for 
        > homecare has come back through the ED for replacement.  Does 
        > anyone e lse 
        > feel the same way or have the same experience? 
        > Not trying to start an argument, just wondering if anyone else
is 
        > havingthe same results with midlines as me. 
        > 
        > ----- Original Message ---- 
        > From: Chris Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 6:54:25 AM 
        > Subject: Midline guidelines from AVA roundtable 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > For those who could not open the original document posted,
here is one 
        > as a word document.  Thanks 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Chris Cavanaugh, CRNI 
        > 
        > 3606 Molona Dr. 
        > 
        > Orlando, FL 32837 
        > 
        > 407-928-9297 
        > 

        
        -----------------------------------------------------
        Confidentiality Disclaimer 

        This message, including any attachments, is confidential,
intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information
that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law,
including PHI (Protected Health Information) covered under the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.  If you
are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you receive this message in error, or are not the named
recipient(s), please notify the sender or contact the University of
Louisville Health Care I.S. helpdesk at 502.562.3637 to report an
inadvertently received message. 

        -----------------------------------------------------
        

********************Confidentiality Notice********************



This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom 
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure or distribution of this email message, including any attachment, is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by 
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.


Reply via email to