I very much prefer the present operation over Bob's proposal. Some
thoughts ...
1. Many problems iterate to a solution and the iteration steps are
valuable for their information and for gaining an understanding of
experience or level of trust with each responder.
2. Many problems are presented by "newbies". Because of their lack
of experience, they probably do not (yet) have a good grasp of
what is important or what is good or bad advice. The newbie
summary would not be as valuable. Perhaps experts would have
given important information/explanation, but it would lost in the
summary.
3. Many problems aren't initially stated with enough information.
With our current format, everyone learns the information that is
important.
4. This group seems to me to be pretty close to being a
"community". The proposal would, IMHO, destroy that community
spirit.
5. A number of folks spend a considerable amount of their time, and
sometimes their employers time, helping readers of this mailing
list. They may not be so inclined to write to make individual
replies. I won't.
However, that's not to say that we can't strive to all use our time
well. I (counter-) propose:
1. If you're not sure, but want to help, send your response
privately, not to the group.
2. If you received good advice, tell the group and summarize the good
advice.
3. If you received good advice privately, summarize the good advice
to the group, but leave private details (such as the identity of
the advice giver) private.
4. Never, never post just "Thanks".
Finally, does anyone know if the mailing list content is available on
the web or via Atom/RSS? That might be helpful to Bob or others. The
Listserv mailing list manager does, but I don't know about Mailman
capabilities.
Hope this helps!
cheers, wayne
Bob Stump wrote, in part, on 5/12/2006 12:10 PM:
The knowledge and experience level in this group is valuable.
Unfortunately it is also very busy with a single thread growing into
multiple replies to all.
Can the volume be cut down by following this simple etiquette?
1) originator posts question
2) participants reply directly to the originator (not reply all)
3) originator collects replies and posts resolution or further enquirers
4) participants reply directly to the originator's additional questions
5) originator posts solution
I have already started following the above described procedure and
sent my replies to the originators only.
If just the regularly active members follow this etiquette, then
perhaps we can grow into a larger community.
I realize that not all will comply because new members are added every
day.
But, very unfortunately there are also members that cancel their
subscription due to the high level of activity.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
