Thanks for the input Paul. Maybe I should specify the problem I have, a whole bunch on windows servers I have recently added fail with 156's, however I have double checked that VSP_Use = NO so am at my wits end as to why they would be failing with anything related to snapshot's. if anyone has come across this or could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated, the only difference with these policies is that we have started to use checkpoint as a few of them are in the TB arena. Regards Dave Clooney
________________________________ From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 December 2006 14:36 To: Clooney, David; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Checkpoint on backups. >From what I understand, when you hit a checkpoint, the current fragment is >completed, then a marker "checkpoint" is written, then another fragment begins. In other words, I don't believe checkpoints will work unless you have a fragment size specified. Even then, if your fragment size is large compared to the amount of data on the client you're backing up, then it may not be worthwhile. I don't know a whole lot of detail about them, other than that. Paul -- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney, David Sent: December 11, 2006 6:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Veritas-bu] Checkpoint on backups. Hi, Can anyone give a brief explanation of exactly what goes on when checkpoint's are implemented on normal backup schedules. Understand what they do but need to know what is going on in the background. Cheers Dave ==================================================================================== La version française suit le texte anglais. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity. If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - [email protected] http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
