Try NetApp NDMP streamer, which allows you to leverage the deduplication in
NDMP backups.

You need at least PureDisk 6.6.x + NBU 6.5.4 with EEB.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:58 PM, <ccosta....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good news is that with 7.01 coming out in a month or so will allow NBU to
> multi-stream NDMP data to a single tape drive.
>
> This will/may alleviate some of the performance issues many of you
> experience each day. However I am not sure of any limitations of this
> feature patch may have.
>
> Chris
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Ambrose, Monte" <mambr...@qualcomm.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:38:41
> To: Jonathan Dyck<jd...@bank-banque-canada.ca>; Jeff Cleverley<
> jeff.clever...@avagotech.com>; rusty.ma...@sungard.com<
> rusty.ma...@sungard.com>
> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and Millions of Files
>
> You could also use NetBackups Snap Mirror to tape.  You would need a NetApp
> snap mirror license.
>
> The Pros
> It uses snapmirror and sends the data off to tape.  It is a RAW volume
> backup and is extremely fast - 10X in many cases.
> It can be fully configured in NetBackup
>
> The Cons
> It backs up the entire volume - so if you have a 1TB volume and only 400GB
> are used it will backup 1tb
> You cant restore a single file or dir.  You have to restore the entire
> thing.
> You cant mix with incremental backups.
>
> Monte
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
> veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Dyck
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:21 AM
> To: Jeff Cleverley; rusty.ma...@sungard.com
> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and Millions of Files
>
> We do our NetApp backups (old GF940 metro cluster) with a combination of
> snapshots (which are available at both sites) and NDMP here. Our NDMP
> obviously holds all the long retention data.
>
> The data size isn't huge compared to some (6.5TB,  ~40M files), but we've
> had to resort to multiple policies and multi-streaming to back it up in a
> reasonable amount of time (less than 60 hours for a full on the wknd).  The
> way it works is:
>
> PolicyA (vol1): explicitly lists 37 different paths for the backup
> selection list,  we've empirically determined these are the "smaller"
> folders
> PolicyB (vol1-long): explicitly lists 16 paths for the backup selection
> list,  we've determined these are the "large" folders
> PolicyC (vol1-Catch-missed-directory): we've mounted the root of vol1 on a
> Linux host,  and we back it up via NFS, excluding the 37+16 paths defined
> above.  If this policy's full backup every gets too large (over 10GB or so),
>  we review the contents and add new paths to PolicyA or PolicyB as
> necessary.  This is necessary because you can't specify wildcards on NDMP
> backups (discussed in this forum several times I believe).
>
> We repeat the above process for vol2.
>
> The above backup data sits on a deduped VTL for 2 months, and then the data
> that is held longer than that is duplicated to tape for long-term storage
> and expired off the VTL.  As we run 5 streams concurrently, the throughput
> is decent, but we peg out the CPU on the NetApp frequently during the backup
> window,  which is a concern.
>
> HTH...
> Jon
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
> veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley
> Sent: June 14, 2010 5:57 PM
> To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and Millions of Files
>
> Rusty,
>
> If you have a way to use Snapvault to backup to another location, I
> would use it.  We have a number of file systems like what you have.  I
> tried NDMP over TCP and NFS backups using dedicated snapshots mounted
> on a client.  Both used a dedicated 10G network.  We basically overran
> our 6030 filer.  We could have jumped through a lot of hoops and split
> backups over multiple weekends, etc, but we decided it wasn't worth
> it.  I haven't tried Flash Backup for a while but it didn't really buy
> us much on what we tried to do with it.  It may work better now.
>
> We backup everything (~200 TB) to NearStores in another building.  We
> use SnapVault instead of SnapMirror.  We can still revert our
> destination volumes to primary r/w file systems if we need to.  We
> don't have the requirement to send tapes off site.  If you do, you
> could still make the tapes from your secondary filer.
>
> Using NFS to tape will give you check points and you can run multiple
> streams to each tape drive.  If you are not hitting the filer
> throughput limits this may work for you.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM,  <rusty.ma...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have a NetApp filer that has a few TB of data made up largely of
> millions
> > of small files (about 30 million or so) and we are using several NDMP
> > policies to back up this data. The two main problems are length of time
> it
> > takes to backup (we usually have 2-3 backups running all day every day)
> and
> > when there is a maintenance or other event in the NBU domain, we have to
> > kill the job, resulting in having to start all over (no checkpoints).
> >
> > For those of you who have faced a similar situation, how are you backing
> up
> > this data?
> >
> > Current thoughts are moving away from NDMP and going with just snapshots
> and
> > then getting the snap offsite either by backing it up or replicating it.
> > We've also thought about backing it up via NFS, but that will probably be
> > slower, though we would get checkpoints.
> >
> > I appreciate any other suggestions anyone has.
> >
> > Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard
> Availability
> > Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693
> > Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪
> http://availability.sungard.com/
> > P Think before you print
> > CONFIDENTIALITY:  This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
> > confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
> > disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error,
> > please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Cleverley
> Unix Systems Administrator
> 4380 Ziegler Road
> Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
> 970-288-4611
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
> ====================================================================================
>
> La version française suit le texte anglais.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the
> Bank of
> Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying
> of this
> email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient
> is
> unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it
> immediately from
> your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou
> confidentielle.
> La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute
> diffusion,
> utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient
> par une
> personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous
> recevez
> ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans
> délai à
> l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de
> votre
> ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Reply via email to