On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> There appear to be differences in where fully qualified domain names > need to be used. > > We have moved most of our environment to 7.1 but do have a few > outstanding issues: > > Can't backup SQL 2000 on MS 2000 (not supported - we put the NBU 6.5.4 > client on this server since there isn't a 7.1 version. Someone on this > list says they got it working with 7.0.1 master and 6.5.3 client.). > > MS-Exchange 2010 GRT restores don't seem to work. We have a case open > for this and have been providing info. This morning we're hearing this > may be a known issue with migrating mailboxes from Exchange 2003 to 2010 > and there may be an engineering binary available. No confirmation yet. > > Issue with bpclntcmd not resolving correct client names from HP-UX media > server. (See forum for my posts on that topic.) > > Also we're running a RHEL6 (Linux) master and I'm seeing system lockups > whenever we try to push extremely large items there. I first saw this > when setting up vaulting which duplicates Data Domain to Quantum i6000 > tape robot. Earlier in the week saw it again when I tried to push > large Exchange (old Exchange 2003) backup to Data Domain. Both of > these issues were mitigated by using the HP-UX media server for vaulting > and to do the backup. (However the backup is the one affected by the > bpclntcmd issue above.) The entire system locked up or just NetBackup? Does a cycle fix it? This is very scary and makes me wonder if 7.1 is ready for heavy production loads? Justin. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu