Justin,
 
Thought I'd follow up with details before and after the changes based on the 
Microsoft link:
 
OS with small files: W2K3 Standard (NTFS)
Backup infrastructure: Media Servers with FC LTO II tape drives
 
Before: 190.6 Gb of just small files
- Backup time: 24 hours
- Restore time: still didn't finish after 4 days
 
After: 191.1 Gb of just small files
- Backup time: 2:55
- Restore: 3:05
 
Scott


>>> Justin Piszcz <jpis...@lucidpixels.com> 11/30/2012 2:20 AM >>>
Hi,
Very interesting, thanks!

Justin.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Scott Jacobson <sjaco...@novell.com> wrote:


Justin,
Wish I knew about this years ago, it fixed an issue you've similarly described 
that we've had with legacy W2K systems.
We created a VM with the settings below, copied the data over - yes it took 
time, but once finished; in one case keep the VM and in another case copied 
another servers data set back to Bare Metal.
It worked. Backups are much better, but more importantly - the restores!
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/121007
Scott Jacobson

>>> "Justin Piszcz" <jpis...@lucidpixels.com> 11/28/2012 4:34 AM >>>

Hello,

Using 7.5.0.3, restoring 1m+ files in a single directory, obviously this would 
take hours/days (bpdbm just runs forever) to start so what I am doing is 
splitting it into chunks and that is helping (it works) but was wondering if 
anyone on this list knows of any special:

DIRECTIVES for bpdbm in the bp.conf to optimize/help speed it up for restores?

It seems there are some interesting ones:

IS_ASCII_CATALOG_FILE_FORMAT
SKIP_NOTIFICATION_FOR_UNIT_TEST
INSIDE_CATALOG_CLEANUP
CLEANUP_KILLED_BY_SIGNAL
CATALOG_BACKUP_PARENT_JOBID
INSIDE_ASA_BACKUP
NB_BPDBM_TEST_DELAY_SOCKET_CLOSE
KEEP_EXISTING_DOTF_DURING_IMPORT
NB_BPDBM_ALIVE_LOCAL_TIMEOUT

There are more as well, does anyone have any tips to improve restore 
performance of lots of files?

Justin.


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Reply via email to