I didn't tried with cross-over cable. Anyway the problem is solved. On both nodes i have applied U4, then the private communication is working fine.
Manuel Braun wrote: > Did you connect both different cards via a cross-over cable? > > Regards > > Manuel > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manuel > Braun > Sent: Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 16:13 > To: Shashi Kanth Boddula; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Private communication problem > > Hi Shashi, > > Why didn't you configured the second required cluster interconnect? > > Regards > > Manuel > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shashi > Kanth Boddula > Sent: Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 14:50 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Veritas-ha] Private communication problem > > I have 2-node VCS 3.5 cluster running on HP-UX 11.11. There is some > problem with private communication which i am not able to understand > what exactly the problem and how to solve it. In each node I have 2 LAN > cards, and i am using LAN1 for private communication. > > Node 1 > ------------ > #cat /etc/llttab > set-node 0 > set-cluster 9 > link lan1 /dev/lan:1 - ether - - > > #cat /etc/llthosts > 0 solstice > 1 express > > #lltstat -n > LLT node information: > Node State Links > * 0 solstice OPEN 2 > > Node 2 > ----------- > > #cat /etc/llttab > set-node 1 > set-cluster 9 > link lan1 /dev/lan:1 - ether - - > #cat /etc/llthosts > 0 solstice > 1 express > #lltstat -n > LLT node information: > Node State Links > 0 solstice CONNWAIT 1 > * 1 express OPEN 2 > > > > In each node, for LAN1, i have assigned a private IP to check whether is > there any network problem. > > node 1 > ---------- > #ifconfig lan1 > lan1: flags=843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> > inet 172.31.0.1 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 172.31.0.255 > > #ping 172.31.0.2 > PING 172.31.0.2: 64 byte packets > 64 bytes from 172.31.0.2: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms > > node 2 > ------------ > #ifconfig lan1 > lan1: flags=1843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,CKO> > inet 172.31.0.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 172.31.0.255 > > #ping 172.31.0.1 > PING 172.31.0.1: 64 byte packets > 64 bytes from 172.31.0.1: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms > > So the above indicates that there is no network issue. > > Node 1 > ------------ > > #lltstat -nvv > LLT node information: > Node State Link Status Address > * 0 solstice OPEN > lan1 UP 00:30:6E:37:09:85 > 1 express CONNWAIT > lan1 DOWN > > Node 2 > ----------- > #lltstat -nvv > LLT node information: > Node State Link Status Address > 0 solstice CONNWAIT > lan1 UP 00:30:6E:37:09:85 > * 1 express OPEN > lan1 UP 00:30:6E:49:D6:97 > > > One point to mention is, on first node, the LAN1 card type is "Fast > Ethernet", and in the second node, the LAN1 card type is "1000-baseT" . > Does this gives any problem ? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-ha maillist - [email protected] > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-ha maillist - [email protected] > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha > _______________________________________________ Veritas-ha maillist - [email protected] http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha
