Hi All,
Thanks for all the information and suggestions it's given me a lot to
look at. Hopefully I've covered all your questions below...
> I've checked and there's no evidence I can find that anyone has made any
changes against the arrays, either via the command line or vea - the latter
which we don't use. However, looking at the tuneable values and what
they're set to and what the defaults are there are two that are different
to the defaults...
fuj411:/root# vxdmpadm gettune all
Tunable Current Value Default Value
------------------------------- ------------- -------------
dmp_failed_io_threshold 57600 57600
dmp_retry_count 5 5
dmp_pathswitch_blks_shift 11 11
dmp_queue_depth 32 32
dmp_cache_open off off
dmp_daemon_count 10 10
dmp_scsi_timeout 30 30
dmp_delayq_interval 15 15
dmp_path_age 0 300
dmp_stat_interval 1 1
dmp_health_time 0 60
dmp_probe_idle_lun on on
dmp_log_level 1 1
dmp_retry_timeout 0 0
fuj411:/root#
I don't know who would've changed these or when, or at all. There's a lot
of disk seen down each path - physical HBA. We have an A and a B side to
the SAN with the disk being presented down both sides to separate HBA's on
the server. The errors and other messages are always to the same array
(IBM_SHARK1) which is the one that has the different value set, and is the
one that see's the throttling against it.
> The version of VxVM is 4.1 MP2 so I know we are downlevel and doesn't
have the new default value of 512 that's come in with 5.1 MP3.
> All paths are active and i/o is seen going down both paths to all disks.
I can see this at the server and the SAN port level. The storage team have
checked and the cannot find anything untoward. I've also had a look at the
HBA's as well (fcinfo hba-port -l <HBA_WWN>)
> The recovery option on both arrays is the same and set to the
following...
fuj411:/root# vxdmpadm getattr enclosure IBM_SHARK0 recoveryoption
ENCLR-NAME RECOVERY-OPTION DEFAULT[VAL] CURRENT[VAL]
==============================================================================
IBM_SHARK0 Throttle Timebound[10] Timebound
[10]
IBM_SHARK0 Error-Retry Fixed-Retry[5] Fixed-Retry
[5]
fuj411:/root#
fuj411:/root# vxdmpadm getattr enclosure IBM_SHARK1 recoveryoption
ENCLR-NAME RECOVERY-OPTION DEFAULT[VAL] CURRENT[VAL]
==============================================================================
IBM_SHARK1 Throttle Timebound[10] Timebound
[10]
IBM_SHARK1 Error-Retry Fixed-Retry[5] Fixed-Retry
[5]
fuj411:/root#
My suspicion is that we have some kind of fault it's just identifying
where. I suspect this will involve getting the server up to the latest
patch levels in the o/s and within the version installed for starters and
getting the storage team to carry out a full end to end test of the
hardware. In the meantime thanks again for all your help with this, very
much appreciated. I think I will take Dmitry's advice and log a call with
Symantec and see if they can explain the difference and whether it's just
the way this array type operates.
Thanks again.
Cheers
Phil.
Dmitry Glushenok
<gl...@jet.msk.su
> To
William Havey <bbha...@gmail.com>
26/07/2012 21:09 phil.cole...@ba.com
cc
veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Re: [Veritas-vx] Question over DMP
partitionsize
Hello William, Phil,
26.07.2012, в 21:25, William Havey написал(а):
Phil,
I don't believe any DMP values are changed by vxconfigd
automatically.
To be certain the partitionsize has not been manually changed,
Is VxVM command line logging enabled? run vxcmdlog -l to find out
If yes, look in /var/adm/vx/cmdlog for any vxdmpadm setattr commands.
Phil using VCS, so cmdlog gets rewritten very fast.
If /etc/vx/dmppolicy.info contains nothing about partition size and other
VCS nodes have same partition size differences - it looks like ASL for
SHARK (or vxdmp itself) is making the changes. And only way to verify this
is contact symantec :)
Do you use vea? If so, its commands are logged in
/var/adm/vx/veacmdlog. But, I don't believe these values can beset in
vea.
I believe the "throttle" and "unthrottle" in the dmpevents log file
means holding back I/O from being addressed and sent out to storage
but I certainly can't say the two (partitionsize of 512 and log
entries for the SHARK1 with that size) are related or not.
Path can be throttled if it holds SCSI command for more than specified
amount of time or if queue depth for the path reaches specified limit. It
can be checked with "vxdmpadm getattr enclosure <enc_name> recoveryoption"
and verified with iostat: asvc_t and actv/wait columns (not sure which
queue vxdmp counts, active or wait).
Are all paths being used for I/O just about the same?
vxdmpadm iostat start
vxdmpadm iostat reset
vxdmpadm iostat show enclosure=IBM_SHARK0 enclosure=IBM_SHARK1
interval=5
The first iteration of the utility shows cumulative statistics from
the time of mounting the file systems. So, ignore the first output.
If totals are about equal, then the value the partitionsize value may
be irrelevant. Perhaps I/O is truly random so that no I/O address is
within 512 sectors of the previous I/O. Even in a random environment
sometimes numerous successive I/O's can be within 512 sectors of each
other so that throttling those I/Os kicks-in.
IHTH,
Bill
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:56 AM, <phil.cole...@ba.com> wrote:
Hi William,
Thanks for the reply. Not sure how to get this track cach
size?
What's confusing me most here is that the values are so different
between
the two arrays. They're identical models set-up up the same and
with the
same number of disks allocated to the servers - sorry, forgot to
mention
they're in an HA pair using VCS. The only difference is that
IBM_SHARK0 is
local to the server where the workload is currently running, and
IBM_SHARK1
is in another building about 1.5KM's away. It's this disparity that
is
confusing me and making me wonder whether an issue we are seeing is
being
caused by this, or if it's an indication of an issue, though I've
been
informed by our storage people that there's nothing wrong with
either
array.
This is certainly not something we've changed so I don't
know if
VxVM/DMP is throttling things back because it's seeing an issue. I
have
seen messages in the /etc/vx/dmpevents.log file for disks in the
IBM_SHARK1
array reporting 'Throttled Path' and then 'Un-throttled Path' and
I'm
trying to work out if the two are linked.
Cheers
Phil.
William Havey
<bbha...@gmail.co
m>
To
phil.cole...@ba.com
26/07/2012 15:48
cc
Subject
Re: [Veritas-vx] Question
over DMP
partitionsize
Partitionsize is in play when the iopolicy is Balanced, which is
the
default policy. You have Balanced.
It is defined as "The partitionsize attribute: Each successive I/O
starting
within in this range (default is 2048 sectors) goes through the
same path
as the previous I/O"
The man page has "Takes the track cache into consideration when
balancing
I/O across paths"
What is the track cache size on each array? Seems that the
partitionsize
should be the same value as the track cache size.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:09 AM, <phil.cole...@ba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand why one array has a wildly
different
partitionsize value to the other...
fuj411:/root# vxdmpadm getattr arrayname IBM_SHARK partitionsize
ENCLR_NAME DEFAULT CURRENT
============================================
IBM_SHARK0 2048 2048
IBM_SHARK1 256 512
fuj411:/root#
Both arrays are IBM ESS SHARK 2105's which are active/active and
operating
in a Balanced i/o policy...
fuj411:/root# vxdmpadm getattr arrayname IBM_SHARK iopolicy
ENCLR_NAME DEFAULT CURRENT
============================================
IBM_SHARK0 Balanced Balanced
IBM_SHARK1 Balanced Balanced
fuj411:/root#
The server is a Fujitsu PW850 running Solaris 10 with VxVM v4.1
MP2. The
volume are mirrored between the two arrays.
I'm trying to get a better understanding of what this means and
why it
would be so different between the two arrays. Any help greatly
appreciated.
Cheers
Phil.
--
This message is private and confidential and may also be legally
privileged. If you have received this message in error, please
email it
back to the sender and immediately permanently delete it from
your
computer system. Please do not read, print, re-transmit, store
or act in
reliance on it or any attachments.
British Airways may monitor email traffic data and also the
content of
emails, where permitted by law, for the purposes of security and
staff
training and in order to prevent or detect unauthorised use of
the
British Airways email system.
Virus checking of emails (including attachments) is the
responsibility of
the recipient.
British Airways Plc is a public limited company registered in
England and
Wales. Registered number: 1777777. Registered office:
Waterside, PO Box
365, Harmondsworth, West Drayton, Middlesex, England, UB7 0GB.
Additional terms and conditions are available on our website:
www.ba.com
_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
--
This message is private and confidential and may also be legally
privileged. If you have received this message in error, please
email it back to the sender and immediately permanently delete it
from your computer system. Please do not read, print, re-transmit,
store or act in reliance on it or any attachments.
British Airways may monitor email traffic data and also the content
of emails, where permitted by law, for the purposes of security and
staff training and in order to prevent or detect unauthorised use
of the British Airways email system.
Virus checking of emails (including attachments) is the
responsibility of the recipient.
British Airways Plc is a public limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 1777777. Registered office:
Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, West Drayton, Middlesex,
England, UB7 0GB.
Additional terms and conditions are available on our website:
www.ba.com
_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
--
Dmitry Glushenok
Jet Infosystems
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get the best from British Airways at ba.com
http://www.ba.com
--
This message is private and confidential and may also be legally privileged.
If you have received this message in error, please email it back to the sender
and immediately permanently delete it from your computer system. Please do not
read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it or any attachments.
British Airways may monitor email traffic data and also the content of emails,
where permitted by law, for the purposes of security and staff training and in
order to prevent or detect unauthorised use of the British Airways email system.
Virus checking of emails (including attachments) is the responsibility of the
recipient.
British Airways Plc is a public limited company registered in England and
Wales. Registered number: 1777777. Registered office: Waterside, PO Box 365,
Harmondsworth, West Drayton, Middlesex, England, UB7 0GB.
Additional terms and conditions are available on our website: www.ba.com
_______________________________________________
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
