The way I see it, the problem applies to *most* columns. With the Base/ Last/Author fields mentioned by the first poster, the content is usually floating in a sea of empty space. In addition, the columns for data/properties/lock status (both in WC and repo) only display icons, so they should always snap to a small size.

With that in mind, if I had to choose one option, I'd probably go with (1) if it did a good job of it. I think if the columns resized intelligently, it would maximize the space available for the Name column, which I think is what most of us would want, anyway.

 - Quinn

On Feb 19, 2009, at 6:55 AM, mguske wrote:

+1

prefer the b) variant

~ Markus

On 19 Feb., 13:58, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey,

Every time I start Versions I proceed to change the column sizes under
the Browse view. The Base, Last, Date and Author columns are bigger
then they need be and the Name column is too small. I like to maximize
the Name column so I can see filenames instead of '...'.

Now for the feature request, I see two possibilities:
1) Intelligent automatic column sizing - Try to make the contents fit
as well as possible within the window size automatically
2) Remember a user's column sizes - They will likely work with similar content so being able to tune the sizes as desired would be a nice way
to go about it as well

If this should already work like this but it doesn't for me for some
reason then please consider this a bug report :)

Regards,

Peter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to