Dirk,

Thanks for replying! Sorry for the delay.

I have setup SSHFS on the mac and it still very slow, especially for
listing directory contents, which translates to really slow times for
Versions. We also have issues our Samba; using Versions over samba is
slow and can cause lead to errors when doing something as simple as
svn up.

So the big advantage to having a SSH tunnel to working copies inside
Versions would be the speed. Not everyone can access their working
copy via samba nor do they have a local development environment so
they can make their changes to the working copy locally. This would
make your product much more useful for a wider range of people, which
I think will translate into more sales for you!

Thanks!

Logan

On Mar 22, 1:04 pm, Dirk Stoop <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Logan,
>
> SSHFS seems like the best way to access the working copy on your
> development server 'locally'.
>
> I don't see a big advantage in offering SSH tunnels to access working
> copies over ssh from within Versions, because it does not seem very
> useful to only be able to access the working copy from within the SVN
> client, but not from other tools you use locally on your working
> machine, like your text editor of choice, etc.
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding what exactly you're looking for, if so,
> please enlighten me.
>
> Thanks!
> - Dirk
>
> the Versions team
>
> On Mar 18, 9:41 pm, llbbl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > anyone else?
>
> > On Mar 6, 10:39 pm, llbbl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > ssh tunnels to working copies so I don't have to setup webdav or sshfs
> > > to my development site(s) since samba is out of the question
>
> > > kkthnkx
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to