+1 here too Sorry, I generally avoid these +1 threads, but Merge seems such an obvious, essential, svn function that is missing from Versions. Pretty much everything else I need is in there.
I kept switching between Versions and SmartSVN (for merging) but now I don't bother I'm in SmartSVN all the time despite its rubbish java GUI. Versions was the easy to use app that introduced svn to our team here. It's what everyone adopted as their app of choice as we brought in new svn based workflows. It was a while before we realised this major feature was missing. At the moment I do all the merges but as branch/ merge become more common for us we are deciding whether we switch to another app or hold out for Versions merge support. Paul On 1 Jun 2009, at 14:22, iVira wrote: > > +1. Version such a great svn client in all other cases. But lack of > conflicts resolving... > I have to avoid revert my changes, update and add them again. It's > such a headache > > On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just a quick question about Versions development road map.... do you >> plan in a near future to addmergesupport??? If so... any ETA?? >> >> I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and themergefunctionality is >> a must for us. >> >> Thanks for answering. >> >> Regards, >> J-C --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
