Thanks for the informative feedback. - Bob
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Quinn Taylor<[email protected]> wrote: > Briefly, I've found that IDE integration for SVN is handy when it allows for > more intelligent refactoring, which both Subclipse and Subversive do. You > could actually argue that if all your projects are managed within Eclipse, > you can get by without Versions. However, Eclipse and I have a love-hate > relationship — great features, but often the implementation is lacking > somewhat. Since I also do a great deal of work in Xcode and other editors, > Versions is an ideal way to manage all my SVN projects. > > - Quinn > > On Jul 26, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Bob Futrelle wrote: > >> I'd like to hear about the pros and cons of Subclipse in this mix. >> Any thoughts? >> >> We write a lot of code, but do OK using Subclipse. Occasionally >> there's a messup that we have to work around, but the web usually has >> the answers. >> >> - Bob Futrelle >> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:47 PM, scott212<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I just put this up as the first in a series of Mac web dev workflow >>> tutorials called "Simplifying Web Dev Workflow on Mac". >>> >>> http://bethink.olioideas.com/?p=59 > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
