Sorry, but this comes across as a rather "snarky" comment. This isn't the first application in the world that requires a remote connection to "activate"... Constructive criticism is one thing, that comment comes across a just plain mean.
Perhaps an organization that would like to use a really nice tool, such as Versions, could "temporarily" provide connectivity to said system(s), so that an application could be "activated". - Andrew Note: I work for a organization that has isolated networks, that are not allowed to communication "outside". Systems are built-out with the necessary tools, scanned, then placed on the network. I am using Versions on one said network, without issue... On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Bob Futrelle <[email protected]>wrote: > > There are things called intranets that are big in big companies. They > don't want them connected to the internet. A lot of code sharing can > go on inside companies using intranets only. But it looks as if they > won't (can't) be using Versions. > > So wake up guys! > > - Bob > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Sofa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Kevin and Stephen, > > > > It's unfortunate yes. But remember that Versions is an application > > that is build on top of a technology that assumes collaboration over > > inter- and intranet. So making part of the application need an > > internet connection isn't that strange. That's not to say we won't > > implement something like this in the future. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Jasper > > the versions team > > > > On Sep 28, 5:01 pm, Kevin Powick <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sep 28, 3:52 am, Vincent Robbesom <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > We do not have an off line registration mode, it is really necessary > >> > to get each machine online for registration. > >> > >> Wow, that's almost unbelievable. There are a lot of environments in > >> which machines simply cannot have Internet access. > >> > >> I guess with a niche product on a relatively small platform this is > >> not something you run into a lot, yet it's surprising that you have no > >> provision for it. > >> > >> -- > >> Kevin Powick > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
