well now this is going to be a tough one.should roe be used or not.if it used primarily for sport then neville i am with you.the fatallity rate is to tremendous to the fish to release fish that are going to die. but if one is going to fish with subsistance in mind then a person should excercise their freedoms to do that. not every one fishes with a fly. and not everyone fish for sport. having been a resident in AK.i understand the need for subsistance. and i know that there they have a 2 fish limit on salmon and most waters restrict the use of roe for trout. regulations are needed to insure we have fishing for all.it is when regulations are neglected that we suffer and that should be up to us the ones who understand that fishing relies on us, to enforce the regs report violations stand up and say something when the riiping and tearing of fish is noticed.this causes us to be a bit uncomfortable but we must do this.say something to the slobs when the beer cans come floating by. hey what ever it takes.now iam not a bait fisherman any more but i do see the need for it when it comes to feeding ones family, but then again it needs to be regulated and enforced .:) < I>
just another penny from
brad the bushwacker
--
Neville Gosling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
List members:
How I hate that word "elite" and "elitist". They are rarely used in
the correct context or meaning.
In B.C., bait fishing with roe is still allowed on many waters
and the bait fishermen use the word to describe fly fishers in
a derogatory or scornful manner. In my view, the use of fish
roe is just too effective and should be banned from use. The
other problem is that some "fishermen" (for want of a better word),
kill fish just for the roe.
Eventually, it is my belief that the use of roe will be banned -
it is just a question of time.
Neville (Nev) Gosling
Greater Vancouver, B.C.
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
