Hi Tom,

Thanks for the info Tom. Yup I've already been to the site. I like the cd500
for the storage, a fraction of even the cheapest memory cards. No download.
I just wonder about the cd drive itself. CD drives fail. On the other hand
CD's as a medium will be around for a long time to come and will only get
cheaper too. Because I like to take LOTS of pictures. I'm still leaning
toward the cd500. It would be hard to take 700+ photo's on a week vacation
with memory cards. On cd's it's only about $19.

BP

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Davenport
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VFB] More on Okuma reels & Camera's


The MVC-CD500 is probably the best incarnation of Sony's Mavica line,
which are the only camera's out there that record directly to a CD.  I
think there is a reason they have no competitors, since it is probably
dead end technology.

Not that the picture quality and features aren't good with the camera,
it is just the performance hit you take while the disk is spinning up
and writing, as well as the bloated camera size.  It is nice to have a
digital camera that will slip into a shirt pocket or fishing vest.

"Digital Film" (the term used for the various kinds of flash memory
cards) is getting very inexpensive and will only get cheaper.  When I
first bought a Nikon 950 Nikon charged $300.00 for a 64 megabyte
Compact Flash card, so recording to a CD made a lot of sense.  I just
saw a 256 megabyte card at Sam's club tonight for $45.00, so things
have changed dramatically!  Higher capacities and lower costs are just
around the corner.  And you can still archive all of your pictures on
CD if you want to and have a CD burner.

The best digital camera review website I have found  is here:

http://www.steves-digicams.com

You can find his review of the Mavica CD500 at:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/cd500.html

I just recently did some extensive  research to buy a five mega-pixel
digital camera and settled on the Pentax Optio 550 which can be
purchased online for around $499.00. I bought it mostly  because it had
the features I wanted. Most digital camera's now days take great
pictures, but features can be important.

Check out the website.  Once you figure out how to navigate it you will
find just about anything you would want to know (including sample
pictures) of just about every camera on the market.

Tom Davenport



On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 08:29 PM, Bill & Tina wrote:

> I use an Okuma Integrity 5/6 for trout. The one pictured here:
> http://www.graysharborcomputer.com/flyfish/images/quinault3/rod.jpg
> The reel
> itself feels really nice and I like the large arbor. The reels drag is
> sort
> of a drag. It just doesn't feel really smooth to me. Other than that
> I'll
> keep using it until something else comes along. For trout it seems to
> mostly
> just hold line anyway. Oh, it does take a good beating and I've never
> had a
> problem when I got it in sand and stuff. My $0.02
>
> Hey folks I'm thinking on getting a new camera... I've taken all of my
> photo's on an old Sony Mavica FD-71.
> See photo's here:
> http://www.graysharborcomputer.com/flyfish/adventure.htm
> Does anybody have any experience with the Sony MVC-CD500? I like the
> storage! Input?
>
> Bill P.
>
> <winmail.dat>




Reply via email to