I think it's a matter of biting or not biting.
Dean
Ian Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was considering the question 'why would a fish bother with something as
small as a nymph or a midge' NOT 'why a fish would why 'choose' one item of
food over another..'
midges may be small but they have a good food value...
I doubt a fish has its weight watchers guide when it comes to feeding... but
it somehow it differentiates between eat and don't eat...
we try to make 'fish don't eats' look like 'fish eats'....
sometimes we have no clue why a fish decided our flies classify as eats...
and some times we have no clue why a fish decides our flies dont classify as
eats...
what do we know... colour, size, and movement all have an impact on whether
fly is in the eat or dont eat category...
I expect that how 'hungry' a fish is also has an impact on how the eat don't
eat decision is made...
any way back to my cave now...
Homepage:-
http://www.angelfire.com/on/theriverbank
SwapPage
http://www.angelfire.com/on/theriverbank/ftswaps.html
_________________________________________________________________
Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/default.asp
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
