Sounds like you have about as many as I do. BTW, gmail now spell checks. 

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:19:40 -0500, David Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's see,  I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] for business to sort clients,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I got for adding cable last week,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is getting tossed after years, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> which I added on a whim to keep VFB exclusive (and to keep up with Mr.
> Spezio), [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my official business mail but either Leto or
> Outlook keeps messing it up, [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is my personal site in
> hibernation, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hibernates with my wife's e-com biz,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is re-routed or dead, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is dead,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be around but I forgot the settings, and Lord
> knows how many others I've forgotten.
> 
> But yes, I like Gmail except there is no spell check yet to my knowledge.
> Considering Outlook and ACT 2005 (SQL) hate each other, I really need to do
> something.
> 
> Back on topic.  Some clients of mine are considering buying one or more
> existing fly shops.  They have asked me to investigate Bush Creek Flies,
> theflyguys2002, importers in general, and my pick, pro-tyers at the VFB.  If
> interested in becoming a source (and getting credit by name), send info to
> me off list.  If you want to discuss the topic on list, keep it within
> Byard's standards.
> 
> Their original idea was to buy good ties from overseas at low prices.  My
> idea was to section off the flys by tyer with the tyer's name by each
> section.  Tyer's could elect to use a nickname if they insist.  Known tyers'
> flys would be priced at a premium.  The clients now want to try both ideas
> in one shop with a "bargain" section behind the "premium" section to see how
> customers react.
> 
> Thanks!    -Murf
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
>

Reply via email to